Water, Coherence, and Mindsight: Observation, Crystallography, and Open Inquiry
Water is the primary substance of the human body and the medium through which all neural and perceptual processes occur. This article explores observational research into water crystallography alongside lived and documented experience in Mindsight training. We examine what has been observed, what remains unexplained, and why water may be a relevant — though not yet understood — factor in perceptual clarity and consciousness research.
Water is often treated as a passive background substance — a neutral carrier for biological and chemical processes. Yet closer examination reveals that water behaves in complex, responsive ways under certain conditions. Across observational research and practical training contexts, water repeatedly appears sensitive to coherence, environment, and relational input.
This article does not attempt to prove a mechanism. Instead, it documents what has been observed, separates observation from interpretation, and outlines why water is increasingly relevant to serious inquiry into perception and Mindsight.
Water as an Active Medium in Living Systems
From a mainstream physiological perspective, water is already recognised as an active participant in biological function. The human brain and nervous system are predominantly water-based. Neural signalling, ion exchange, electrical conductivity, and biochemical communication all occur within an aqueous environment.
Water influences:
electrical signal propagation
ionic balance and timing
protein folding and cellular organisation
In this sense, perception does not occur despite water — it occurs through it.
What remains open is whether water’s role extends beyond chemistry alone.
Early Observational Crystallography Research
One of the earliest and most widely known figures in water crystallography is Masaru Emoto.
Emoto documented frozen water crystals formed after water was exposed to words, written language, music, or sound. He observed that water exposed to harmonious language or music often formed more symmetrical, coherent crystalline structures, while water exposed to harsh language or discordant sound tended toward fragmented or irregular forms.

It is important to be precise. Emoto’s work does not meet modern experimental standards for control or reproducibility, and mainstream science does not accept his conclusions as established fact. However, his work documents repeated pattern variation correlated with stimulus. That distinction matters.
Observation is not proof — but it is often the starting point for inquiry.

Contemporary Water Crystallography and Relational Expression
A more recent and methodical body of work has been developed by Veda Austin, New Zealand, whose research focuses on water’s expressive behaviour under controlled freezing conditions.

Austin works with small volumes of water placed in shallow glass petri dishes or plates. Before freezing, the water is exposed to a relational input — such as an image, object, word, symbol, or defined contextual theme. When frozen, the resulting ice frequently forms organised structures that appear symbolically or visually related to the stimulus.

Not every plate produces a recognisable form. Abstract geometry is common, and Austin documents these results alongside more defined expressions. She does not discard outcomes that fail to “match” expectations.

Crucially, she does not describe this as programming water. Her framing is relational rather than mechanical. Water is treated as responsive, not controllable.
Public Crystallography Kits and Open Exploration
Unlike many researchers, Veda Austin has made aspects of her process accessible through publicly available crystallography kits. These kits include glass petri dishes and written guidance designed for home-based exploration.
The existence of these kits is significant. They allow others to observe water behaviour directly without requiring belief or agreement with any interpretation. At the same time, outcomes are not guaranteed. Even with structured guidance, results vary.
This reinforces a key theme of Austin’s work: water expression appears contextual and relational rather than deterministic.
Mindsight and the Importance of Coherence
Mindsight — the capacity to perceive without ocular input — is not achieved through effort or force. Across repeated training contexts, Mindsight emerges most reliably when the nervous system is regulated, coherent, and low in internal noise.
From direct observation in training:
heightened stress suppresses Mindsight
analytical over-effort collapses perception
relaxed attention improves signal clarity
emotional coherence stabilises perception
These findings are consistent across adults and children.
Where Water and Mindsight Intersect
There is currently no established mechanism linking water crystallography directly to Mindsight. Any claim to the contrary would be premature.
However, a meaningful overlap exists.
Both water expression and Mindsight appear sensitive to:
coherence rather than force
regulation rather than strain
relational context rather than command
Given that the nervous system operates entirely within a water-dominant biological environment, it is reasonable to ask whether internal water states play a role in perceptual clarity.
A careful and defensible framing is this:
Mindsight appears to emerge most readily when the body’s internal environment — including its water-based systems — is coherent, regulated, and low in noise.
This statement rests on physiology and observation, not speculation.
Children, Nervous System State, and Baseline Perception
Children consistently demonstrate stronger baseline access to Mindsight. This is not framed as a special ability, but as a developmental reality.
Children generally exhibit:
lower stress chemistry
fewer conditioned perceptual filters
greater nervous system flexibility
These conditions also correspond to more stable internal environments — including water-based systems within the body. Again, this is correlation, not proof, but it is observed repeatedly.
Future Research and Open Inquiry
The Institute of Consciousness recognises the exploratory nature of water crystallography research. While existing observations are compelling, mechanisms remain unresolved, and claims must remain proportional to evidence.
As part of ongoing inquiry, the Institute of Consciousness intends to conduct its own water crystallography experiments in the near future. These will be approached with the same principles applied to Mindsight research:
clear separation of observation and interpretation
careful documentation of conditions and outcomes
no claims beyond what is directly observed
The aim is not validation, but understanding.
An Invitation to Curiosity
Water crystallography research does not require belief. Nor does Mindsight. Both invite careful attention to what appears when interference is reduced and conditions are coherent.
Whether future science explains these phenomena through physics, electromagnetism, acoustics, or mechanisms not yet understood remains open. What is clear is that water — the substance of life itself — continues to reveal complexity beyond its reputation as a passive medium.
Inquiry begins not with answers, but with honest observation.

